Medicare shared-savings ACOs cut $1 billion in costs over three years
By Shelby Livingston
August 29, 2017 - Modern Healthcare
Accountable care organizations
participating in the CMS' Medicare shared-savings program reduced spending by
about $1 billion in three years, HHS' Office of Inspector General reported
Tuesday.
Most of the 428 ACOs in the first three years of the
shared-savings program reduced Medicare spending compared to their benchmarks,
and a small group of those ACOs produced "substantial" savings.
The
majority of the ACOs—82%—also improved the quality of care they provided, based
on data from the CMS on 33 individual quality measures. They outperformed
fee-for-service providers in 81% of the quality measures.
"While policy
changes may be warranted, ACOs show promise in reducing spending and improving
quality," the OIG report concluded.
The report shows that the initiative
launched under the Affordable Care Act to cut spending, improve care quality and
pay doctors based on value rather than volume is working. The findings come just
weeks after the Trump administration canceled other alternative payment model experiments,
including two mandatory bundled-payment programs, and rolled back
another.
The report adds to the growing body of evidence showing that
while ACO performance varies widely, ACOs are improving the quality of care
overall, said David Muhlestein, chief research officer at Leavitt Partners. Cost
savings—the bulk of which are concentrated among just a few ACOs—have trailed
improvements in quality, he said, but there's promise for both.
"It's not
just about getting paid differently," he said. "It's about providing care
differently, and it takes time."
Clif Gaus, president and CEO of the
National Association of ACOs, said that beyond the positive cost and quality
performance results, the report also shows "a huge acceptance" of the program by
physicians and hospitals. The positive findings are also evidence that ACOs
should be allowed to remain in one-sided risk contracts instead of being
required to enter two-sided risk arrangements, he said.
"This year's
report is further proof that one-sided ACOs are doing well," he said. The vast
majority of ACOs in the program participate in one-sided risk contracts. But CMS
limits one-sided risk ACOs to two contract terms, or six years.
To
control the cost of Medicare spending, the CMS implemented several alternative
payment models under the ACA. These models, including the shared-savings
program, aim to reduce costs while rewarding providers for delivering quality
care.
The Medicare shared-savings program is one of the agency's largest
attempts to overhaul how hospitals and doctors are paid. Launched in 2012, it
accounted for $168 billion in Medicare expenditures over the first three years
of the program.
Under the program, groups of doctors, hospitals and
other healthcare providers coordinate care for patients and work to reduce
unnecessary spending. There were 428 participating shared-savings program ACOs
serving 9.7 million beneficiaries in the first three years. Each ACO served an
average 18,500 beneficiaries in 2015. ACOs sign three-year contracts with
Medicare under the program.
The shared-savings program ties financial
incentives to a provider organization's performance on reducing costs compared
to a benchmark and hitting quality targets. In the first three years, there were
33 quality targets. Successful ACOs keep a share of the savings they generate
for Medicare.
The OIG found that one-third of participating ACOs reduced
spending enough to receive a portion of the savings during the first three years
of the program. These ACOs reduced spending by about $2.8 billion from 2013 to
2015. Of that amount, the ACOs received $1.3 billion in shared-savings payments,
or about $4.8 million each for every year they earned shared savings. They use
that money to invest in new care programs, provide incentives to providers to
improve quality, or update their electronic health records.
Two-thirds
of participating ACOs, or 282 ACOs, reduced spending for at least one of the
years they participated in the program. The remaining 146 ACOs did not reduce
spending, and they exceeded their benchmarks in spending for each of the years
they participated in the program.
In 2015 alone, 57% of ACOs that were
in the program for three years reduced spending, while 46% of ACOS in the
program for one year reduced spending in 2015. That finding shows that more
established ACOs are learning how to achieve greater savings over time, the OIG
report stated.
A small group of ACOs, characterized as "high-performing,"
reduced spending by an average $673 per beneficiary between 2010 and 2015 for
key Medicare services, the report found. Other ACOs increased spending by $707
per beneficiary while fee-for-service providers increased spending by an average
of $673 per beneficiary.
In total, ACOs reduced spending by $3.4 billion
in the first three years of the shared-savings program. About half of that
figure was generated by just 36 ACOs. But ACOs that exceeded their benchmarks
increased spending by about $2.4 billion during the three-year period, meaning
the net reduction in spending across all ACOs was $1 billion.
Participating ACOs also improved the quality of care they delivered to
patients. In the program, each ACO receives an overall quality score ranging
from 0 to 100. In 2014, ACOs had an average quality score of 86. That figure
increased to 91 in 2015.
Moreover, 74% of participating ACOs achieved a
quality score of 90 or higher in 2015, up from just 29% in 2014.
ACOs
showed the most improvement on two quality measures: They increased the
percentage of beneficiaries who were screened for depression from a median of
26% in 2013 to 46% in 2015. ACOs also increased the portion of beneficiaries
screened for a fall risk from 35% in 2013 to 59% in 2015, the report
stated.
Participating ACOs outperformed fee-for-service providers on most
measures. For example, ACOs performed better than 90% of all fee-for-service
providers on lowering hospital readmissions.
The number of ACOs
participating in the shared-savings program also grew between 2013 and 2015, the
OIG report said. While 220 ACOs participated in the program in 2013, that number
grew to 333 in the second year and 392 in the third year. The report said a
total of 36 ACOs dropped out in the first three years. While ACOs served just
10% of Medicare beneficiaries in 2013, they served 19% of all Medicare members
by 2015.
Gaus noted that the majority of ACOs participate in the
one-sided risk track of the shared-savings program.